General Court Finds ‘BRAVO’ and ‘Brave Paper’ Confusingly Similar
Claudia Csáky recently analysed the decision of the General Court of the European Union of May 8, 2019, T-37/18 – BRAVO v. Brave Paper in INTA Bulletin.
Claudia Csáky recently analysed the decision of the General Court of the European Union of May 8, 2019, T-37/18 – BRAVO v. Brave Paper in INTA Bulletin.
Jakob Widner recently discussed a new law that grants fathers a legal entitlement to one month off work following the birth of their child.
Otto Waechter recently analysed the current status of virtual currency regulations in the European Union and Austrian legislation.
On the occasion of Gunter Nitsche’s 75th birthday Graf Isola celebrated the presentation of the Festschrift: “Corporations and Corporate Law in academia and practice. Festschrift for Gunther Nitsche’s 75th birthday”.
Jakob Widner recently discussed the Supreme Court’s decision on gender-based differences in hairstyles at employer’s request (OGH 9 ObA 4/19g), which the Court held to be discriminatory.
Claudia Csáky and Isabella Wiener recently analysed a decision of the Supreme Court (OGH 4Ob213/18d), whether the infringer of a registered Community design has to hand over the entire net profit or just a share of profit earned due to its use of an infringed design.
In the recent ILO newsletter Alexander Isola and Fran Gebauer analysed the impact of restructuring plans on non-participating creditors.
Claudia Csáky recently analysed the decision of the General Court of the European Union of December 6, 2018, T-638/16 – Deichmann SE (Deichmann) v. EUIPO, intervener Vans Inc. (Vans) in INTA Bulletin.
Claudia Csáky recently analysed the decision of the General Court of the European Union of October 15, 2018, T-164/17 – Pink Lady in INTA Bulletin.
The Insolvency Act provides insolvency administrators with tools to challenge any actions committed by a debtor during a crucial period prior to the opening of insolvency proceedings. Recent Supreme Cour decisions regarding § 31 IO now clarify existing judicature regarding avoidance of overdraft payments due to preferential treatment and set the bar very high regarding the (un)avoidability of overdraft payments in the 12 months before the opening of insolvency proceedings.